Informational article
How to document a product test in a review?
In preparation
Link Building for Affiliate Marketing
We grow the publisher's own site — not a network of merchant feed copies. Placements link to comparisons and tools that carry a transparent methodology, a date, a disclosed commercial relationship, and a controlled click path.
2000+
owned portals
30
topical categories
12 mo.
indexation monitoring
Category matched to niche
Portal for comparison-intent audience
MethodologyLast updatedDisclosure
Publication topic
How to compare offers based on your specific needs?
Methodological guidepublisher.com/comparison
Portal database
2000+ portals is a niche map, not automatic diversification
The network covers all 30 categories, including 946 portals with at least 100 monthly sessions according to panel data. For any given domain, the effective selection is narrowed by niche, user profile, decision type, and the current state of the destination page — the full network size is not the campaign's reach.
2000+
topical sites
946 sites with ≥100 visits/mo.
30
topic categories
2
link paths
12 mo.
indexation monitoring
Portal selection criteria
- 01
Niche and audience profile
The external portal, topic, and publisher asset all address the same decision and the same audience segment — not just the same broad category.
- 02
Original page value
We verify first-hand testing, methodology, proprietary data, a calculator, a comparison, or category navigation that readers cannot get from a merchant feed.
- 03
Disclosure and link attributes
The commercial relationship is visible to the reader before they click, and affiliate links together with paid placements carry the correct attributes.
- 04
Freshness and ownership
Rankings, prices, terms, links, and program status each have a date, a source, a review frequency, and a named person responsible for updates.
- 05
Domain and source history
Across multiple sites we track which portal, topic, and URL were used, without replicating the same content cluster under different domain brands.
We never select portals based on a single metric alone.
Collaboration paths
Are you building visibility for a site built on rankings and reviews, or for a portal driven by live offers and active promotions?
Editorial teams own the accuracy of the evaluation; affiliate operations own the functioning of offers and measurement. Commission connects both areas but cannot allow one to mask failures in the other.
Path 01
Methodology, testing, and recommendations
- Who it's for
- Editors, subject-matter experts, reviewers, data analysts, or site owners who produce comparisons, reviews, rankings, calculators, or buying guides.
- What you gain
- Who is the recommendation for, which offers were included in the sample, where do the criteria and weights come from, what was actually tested, under what conditions, which data came from the manufacturer, how does commission influence the outcome, and when does the result expire.
- Link destination
- A comparison, review, or tool with a named author, documented methodology, publication date, defined market scope, user profiles, supporting evidence, cited sources, commercial disclosure, and a changelog for material updates.
- Materials
- Editorial policy, merchant list, inclusion criteria, scoring model, test protocol, original photos or proprietary data, access to subject-matter experts, pricing and specification sources, sponsorship terms, and an update schedule.
- Editorial boundary
- We distinguish between first-hand testing, document analysis, and partner-supplied claims. We do not describe a partial list as the full market, nor call a scoring output 'objective' without justifying the weights and disclosing conflicts of interest.
Sample topics
- How to build a ranking methodology for multiple user profiles?
- How to document the conditions of a product test?
- How to disclose the influence of an affiliate program on a comparison?
Path 02
Offer freshness, click paths, and attribution
- Who it's for
- Affiliate managers, content operations teams, analysts, and site administrators who maintain merchants, data feeds, links, redirects, disclosures, and conversion tracking.
- What you gain
- Which price and offer are current, for which market and user, when were they last verified, where does the link go, does it work across devices, how is the relationship disclosed, what is the attribution model, which consents are required, and what happens when the program ends.
- Link destination
- An offers, coupon, calculator, or comparison page with a visible last-updated timestamp, merchant scope, a source for variable data, working links, and a fallback for expired offers.
- Materials
- Program terms, feed or API access, offer IDs, regions, devices, currencies, expiry dates, commission models, redirect schema, rel attributes, consent configuration, link testing results, and a sunsetting plan.
- Editorial boundary
- We do not guarantee pricing, availability, or commission attribution without stated conditions. Readers see that a link is affiliate in nature, and any variable offer displays its timestamp and source — broken redirects are not left silent.
Sample topics
- How to test an affiliate link across multiple devices?
- How to label price and terms with a last-verified timestamp?
- What to do with a page after an affiliate program ends?
Packages
How many links do you need?
The scope can support a single methodology, multiple decision types, or separate domains. Each domain retains its own audience profile, source standards, publication history, and update policy.
Single Methodology
10publications
A campaign for one content cluster, ranking, or tool with a finalized editorial policy and an update process in place.
- One defined audience segment
- Sources and criteria confirmed before publication
- Disclosure and link integrity checks
Lower unit cost
Pricing after portal selection
Content & Monetization
20publications
Scaling comparisons and reviews alongside live offer accuracy and click-path management across multiple topics.
- Two parallel control tracks
- Editorial methodology plus affiliate ops
- Offer and change registry
Lower unit cost
Pricing after portal selection
Publisher Portfolio
30publications
A program spanning multiple clusters or owned domains, where each domain has a distinct audience, standalone value, publication history, and update owner.
- Separate domain maps per site
- No feed duplication across properties
- Ongoing freshness review over time
Lower unit cost
Pricing after portal selection
How it works
How we work together
- 1
Send your brief
Tell us about the site, niche, target market and campaign goal. We'll use that to scope the work.
- 2
Site selection & pricing
We match sites to your topic, audience and budget, then send a proposal for your approval.
- 3
Content & approval
You can supply a ready article or ask us to write one — either way you sign it off before we publish.
- 4
Publication & monitoring
Once approved, we publish and start monitoring indexation.
What's included
What you receive after each publication
Before publication we verify the page's value, methodology, and commercial path. After approval we report the placement and monitor indexation.
Domain, cluster, and value map
We document niches, pages, decision types, and original contributions. Advertiser campaigns and white-label agency link building are handled under separate engagements.Methodology and conflict-of-interest record
We log the sample, criteria, weights, tests, sources, funding, affiliate programs, exclusions, and the disclosure method used.Offer and click-path registry
We map each merchant, offer ID, market, date, source, URL, redirect, attribute, device, program status, and update owner.Content, approval, and indexation monitoring
We produce the external article. The publisher's editorial team signs off on the conclusions, affiliate operations confirms the terms, and legal reviews the disclosures. After publication we deliver the live URL and monitor indexation for 12 months.
See if we're the right fit
Send a brief for one client — we'll come back with a portal proposal, role breakdown, and a rough timeline.
Important for this industry
What we will not link without a confirmed niche, standalone asset value, and correct relationship disclosure
- We do not link destination pages without standalone value — a ranking, review, or tool must contribute methodology, test results, or data that goes beyond a description of the affiliate program.
- We do not select an external portal without confirming the publisher's niche, the asset type, and how the commercial relationship is disclosed to readers.
- We do not use the same portal and topic for a ranking, a review, and an offer page — each destination page type requires its own portal category.
- We do not proceed with publication when the affiliate link is missing rel="sponsored" or when the paid relationship is not disclosed on the external portal.
Jak pracujemy
Publisher niche and asset type determine the portal — not the size of the network
2000+ portals across 30 categories — publisher niche and asset type determine the actual selection
Before every campaign we map the site's niche, the type of destination page, and the asset type — ranking, review, tool, or offer. This narrows the pool from 2000+ portals down to those that match the publisher's niche and the reader's decision stage, not simply to the total count in the network.
Each external portal links to a single destination page — not the site's homepage
The destination page is confirmed before portal selection: a ranking, comparison, or calculator must bring its own methodology and disclose the commercial relationship. A link without a clearly identified page with real standalone value is not moved forward.
Asset type determines portal category — a ranking does not go on the same portal as a coupon offer
Rankings and methodology-backed reviews go to portals with topical editorial teams. Offers, codes, and prices go to comparison portals. Calculators and decision guides go to niche portals where the target audience makes purchasing decisions. A single link building campaign does not serve all asset types simultaneously.
Affiliate links and paid placements require separate attributes before the link goes live
Every placement on an external portal documents whether the link is paid (rel="sponsored"), and the commercial relationship must be visible before the reader clicks. We do not proceed with publication without confirming the disclosure — both on the portal side and within the publisher's own policy.
Comparisons & rankingsTest-backed reviewsCalculatorsOffers & tracking
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers covering disclosures, rel sponsored, rankings, product testing, offers, tracking, multi-domain setups, thin affiliation, and AI visibility.
For publishers growing their own comparison site, review hub, rankings, calculators, or niche portal. An advertiser recruiting affiliate partners needs a different strategy from a publisher building their own domain's link equity.
The disclosure must be unambiguous, visible near the content, and understandable before the reader acts. Regulators in most markets require that recommendations involving material financial benefit be treated as commercial communications; the exact format depends on the medium and jurisdiction.
Google recommends rel="sponsored" for affiliate links regardless of whether they are added manually or dynamically. Nofollow remains an accepted way to signal a paid relationship.
User profile, market scope, the list of offers considered, criteria, weights, sources, test results, disqualification conditions, commission influence, author credit, publication date, and an update policy.
When the publisher can name the tester, the product variant, the usage period, the environment, the procedure, the outcome, and the limitations — and has retained original supporting evidence. Reviewing manufacturer specifications does not constitute hands-on testing.
Affiliate content that adds no original value — for example, descriptions and reviews copied verbatim from merchants or affiliate networks. Original research, rigorous testing, independent comparisons, proprietary data, and genuinely useful navigation can all constitute real added value.
Every dynamic element should have a documented source, a last-verified timestamp, a review frequency, a current status, and a named owner. When an offer expires, it is removed, archived, or clearly marked as historical.
Yes, provided each domain has a distinct niche, separate audience, independent assets, and its own publication history. We do not distribute placements mechanically across sites that are effectively copies of the same content and feed.
No. We can verify links and document conditions, but outcomes depend on the user, consent signals, device, redirect integrity, attribution window, program rules, and transaction approval.
No. Original methodology and supporting evidence can increase content utility, but they do not guarantee indexation, search rankings, AI citations, clicks, or commissions.
Last updated: July 2026
Next step
Have a methodology, data set, or tool worth promoting?
Share your domain, niche, methodology, sources, disclosure policy, and priority assets. We will match placements to the real value your site delivers.
2000+owned portals
30topical categories
12 mo.indexation monitoring
See also